Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...
1: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 29;105(17):6498-501. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
Related Articles, Links
Click here to read Click here to read Click here to read
Comment in:
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group.

Bode M, Wilson KA, Brooks TM, Turner WR, Mittermeier RA, McBride MF, Underwood EC, Possingham HP.

The Ecology Center, School of Integrative Biology and Department of Mathematics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, Australia. mbode@unimelb.edu.au

Priorities for conservation investment at a global scale that are based on a single taxon have been criticized because geographic richness patterns vary taxonomically. However, these concerns focused only on biodiversity patterns and did not consider the importance of socioeconomic factors, which must also be included if conservation funding is to be allocated efficiently. In this article, we create efficient global funding schedules that use information about conservation costs, predicted habitat loss rates, and the endemicity of seven different taxonomic groups. We discover that these funding allocation schedules are less sensitive to variation in taxon assessed than to variation in cost and threat. Two-thirds of funding is allocated to the same regions regardless of the taxon, compared with only one-fifth if threat and cost are not included in allocation decisions. Hence, if socioeconomic factors are considered, we can be more confident about global-scale decisions guided by single taxonomic groups.

Publication Types:
PMID: 18413614 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

PMCID: PMC2359771