Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...
1: JAMA. 2008 Mar 19;299(11):1335-44.
Related Articles, Links
Click here to read Click here to read
Erratum in:
  • JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2150.

How to interpret a genome-wide association study.

Pearson TA, Manolio TA.

Office of Population Genomics, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2154, USA.

Genome-wide association (GWA) studies use high-throughput genotyping technologies to assay hundreds of thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and relate them to clinical conditions and measurable traits. Since 2005, nearly 100 loci for as many as 40 common diseases and traits have been identified and replicated in GWA studies, many in genes not previously suspected of having a role in the disease under study, and some in genomic regions containing no known genes. GWA studies are an important advance in discovering genetic variants influencing disease but also have important limitations, including their potential for false-positive and false-negative results and for biases related to selection of study participants and genotyping errors. Although these studies are clearly many steps removed from actual clinical use, and specific applications of GWA findings in prevention and treatment are actively being pursued, at present these studies mainly represent a valuable discovery tool for examining genomic function and clarifying pathophysiologic mechanisms. This article describes the design, interpretation, application, and limitations of GWA studies for clinicians and scientists for whom this evolving science may have great relevance.

Publication Types:
PMID: 18349094 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]