Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...
1: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2007 May;63(Pt 5):611-20. Epub 2007 Apr 21.
Related Articles, Links
Click here to read Click here to read
Comment in:
Stereochemical restraints revisited: how accurate are refinement targets and how much should protein structures be allowed to deviate from them?

Jaskolski M, Gilski M, Dauter Z, Wlodawer A.

Department of Crystallography, Faculty of Chemistry, A. Mickiewicz University and Center for Biocrystallographic Research, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

The Protein Data Bank and Cambridge Structural Database were analyzed with the aim of verifying whether the restraints that are most commonly used for protein structure refinement are still appropriate 15 years after their introduction. From an analysis of selected main-chain parameters in well ordered fragments of ten highest resolution protein structures, it was concluded that some of the currently used geometrical target values should be adjusted somewhat (the C-N bond and the N-C(alpha)-C angle) or applied with less emphasis (peptide planarity). It was also found that the weighting of stereochemical information in medium-resolution refinements is often overemphasized at the cost of the experimental information in the diffraction data. A correctly set balance will be reflected in root-mean-square deviations from ideal bond lengths in the range 0.015-0.020 A for structures refined to R factors of 0.15-0.20. At ultrahigh resolution, however, the diffraction terms should be allowed to dominate, with even higher acceptable deviations from idealized standards in the well defined fragments of the protein. It is postulated that modern refinement programs should accommodate variable restraint weights that are dependent on the occupancies and B factors of the atoms involved.

Publication Types:
PMID: 17452786 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]